4. The Document of Religious Rights: A fireball in the face of Shaykh al-Zifzaf

Publishers

Year: 
2006
Week: 
15
Article number: 
4
Article pages: 
p. 17
Date of source: 
10-04-2006
Author: 
Zaynab ‘Abd Allah
Reviewer: 
Shayma’ al-Shami
Article summary: 

The controversial ‘Document of Religious Rights’ signed in April 2005 by the then head of the Azhar’s Interfaith Dialogue Committee, Shaykh Fawzī al-Zifzāf with visiting U.S. Christian clerics has made headlines in Egyptian press.

Article full text: 

A few days ago, some Egyptian newspapers headlines read: ‘The Azhar signs an international religious rights document allowing Christian missionary work in Egypt,’ Zaynab Abd Allāh writes. The news said that this document was signed by the Azhar with visiting U.S. Christian clerics in April 2005 [See AWR, 2005, 16, art. 3].

In its issue no. 421 of April 18, 2006, al-Usbou managed to secure a scoop, publishing a long report under the title “Did the Azhar approve a U.S. document on freedom of proselytizing for Christianity in the Muslim world?” together with a copy of this controversial document.

In the above-mentioned report, Mustafa Sulaymān of al-Usbou outlined the 17 items of the document, which was signed by the then head of the Azhar’s Interfaith Dialogue Committee, Shaykh Fawzī al-Zifzāf on behalf of the grand imām of the Azhar, Shaykh Muhammad Sayyid Tantāwī, during a meeting with a U.S. delegation calling itself ‘Ambassadors for Peace’.

The delegation included pastors Emile Haddād, Gary Andsell, Adīb Ghubryāl and Dr. Muhammad al-Batrān.

Asked for comment on the content of the document, member of the Islamic Research Academy, Dr. Jamāl al-Dīn Mahmoud warns against item 12 which reads: “Every person no matter what religion, race, or nationality has the right to live at peace with their neighbor, no matter what their faith.” Stating that Islam orders Muslims to fight against the occupiers, Dr. Mahmoud argues that this item offers protection for the “Zionist entity.”

Meanwhile, Shaykh al-Zifzāf argues that the document does not contain a single item that contradicts the Islamic sharīa and that it was signed with the approval of Shaykh Tantāwī. Strangely enough, Zaynab Abd Allāh states, the grand imām denies all knowledge of the document, diclaiming the Ahzhar’s responsibility for it.

*Similar news was reported by al-Akhbār of April 5, 2006 (p. 1), al-Jumhourīya of April 5, 2006 (p. 1), al-Sharq al-Awsat of April 5, 2006 (p. 9) and al-Fajr of April 10, 2006 (p. 4)

Fulltext type: 
Summary
Quality: 
The article contains no obvious errors...
Classification: 
Opinion
Share this