2. Religious Affairs Committee and the Muslim Brotherhood reject the Document of Religious Rights

Glossary

Year: 
2006
Week: 
16
Article number: 
2
Date of source: 
13-04-2006
Author: 
Not mentioned
Article summary: 

The Document of Religious Rights, signed in April 2005 by the former head of

the Interfaith Dialogue

Committee, Dr. Fawzī al-Zifzāf, with visiting U.S. Christian clerics, has

been categorically rejected

by the Religious Affairs Committee of the People’s Assembly, on the grounds that

it "promotes apostasy and

grants freedom of proselytizing for other religions.”

Article full text: 

[Editor: See

AWR 2006, 15, art. 5 for

Shaykh al-Zifzāf’s comment on this document]

The Religious

Affairs Committee of the

People’s Assembly categorically rejected yesterday the Document of Religious

Rights, signed by former head of the

Azhar’s Interfaith Dialogue Committee, Shaykh

Fawzī al-Zifzāf with visiting

U.S. Christian clerics. Muslim Brotherhood representatives in the

parliament backed the decision of the committee,

currently headed by two leaders of the ruling National

Democratic Party (NDP).

The document recognizes

"the individual’s right to believe in the religion of

their choice,” and stipulates that "each

religion lived out by individuals or an organization has the

right to peacefully present its view of theology,

people, and the hereafter.”

During a special

session of the parliament, co-chaired by Dr. Ahmad

‘Umar Hāshim [Reviewer: No function

mentioned] and Member of Parliament Dr. Zaynab Radwān,

members of the Religious Affairs Committee

unanimously rejected the document, describing it as "a dubious

document, which promotes apostasy and grants

freedom of proselytizing for other religions.”

"This

dubious document is not binding on us,

given the fact that it has not been submitted to the People’s Assembly or

to the Islamic Research

Academy,” Dr. Hāshim said.

Deputy head of the committee,

‘Alā’

Hasānīn argued that the document is null and void because it has not been

presented to the

parliament, Majdī ‘Abd al-‘Āl writes in al-Sharq al-

Awsat of April 18,

2006.

"Men and women everywhere have the God given right to convert or not to

convert to any religion

without harm from any other religion or national politic. The individual has the right to

debate the facts

about his or her religion without fear of reprisal,” the document read.

"For two

years, the

dubious document has been placed on the Internet site of ’Ambassadors for Peace’

[http://www.ambassadorsforpeace.info/] in three langauages: English, Arabic and Spanish. The document only came to

the attention of religious institutions after the Egyptian press had uncovered it,” Anwar al-

Ja‘farī and Walīd ‘Urābī write in al-Maydān of

April 13.

According to al-Ja‘farī and ‘Urābī, the head of the

third Zurich-based Coptic conference, ‘Adlī Abādīr, "uncovered the Azhar’

s involvement in signing this document,” which they say "grants freedom of proselytizing for

Christianity and Judaism in Egypt.” Under the signed document, Abādīr has called on the

Egyptian government to commit itself to implementing all items of the document. During the conference,

Abādīr distributed copies of the signed document to the participants.

Fulltext type: 
Summary
Quality: 
The article contains no obvious errors...
Classification: 
Opinion
Share this