A conference in Cairo on "citizenship from a
pluralistic
perspective," organized by the Arab Team for Islamic-Christian Dialogue, formed in 1996 following an
initiative by Arab Muslim and Christian thinkers, has seen serious dialogue on Muslim-Christian relations in
Egypt.
Two years ago it seemed that Muslim-Christian dialogue had gone through a punishing ordeal,
being
marred by the Wafā’ Costantine incidents and the notorious CD containing a play staged inside a
church
about the Muslim faith, followed by the Muslim Brotherhood’s political ascension and the qualitative
shift in
the discourse and practices of the expatriate Copts.
Participants from the Muslim side put
forward some
concerns about the role played by church leaders as the case with the Constantine and
Alexandria play crises.
Former Brotherhood member Abu al-‘Ilā Mādī said that there
is no Orthodox Copt who
can criticize Pope Shenouda III, the patriarch of the See of Saint Mark, in
public.
Coptic laymen have
clearly reiterated their rejection against any insult to Islam or inter-
faith duels, but this does not mean they
should dictate their instructions to church leaders to offer an
apology, nor should they criticize them on certain
positions they have adopted.
Likewise, when a
Muslim or a mosque imām attacks Christianity or
Christians, Copts only ask their Muslim partners
in the dialogue to reject such excesses and declare a clear
position regarding them, but they never ask for
an apology from the Muslim religious institution.
The state
is definitely dealing with the head of
the Egyptian church as if he were the leader of Copts, speaking and
negotiating on their behalf and even
containing their anger if the need arises.
The Islamist camp usually
criticizes Pope Shenouda when he
takes up the issues of Copts, but jubilates on his stands regarding the
Palestinian issue, as if Islamists
want the church to play a political role in support of their project.
One
of the speakers was Dr.
Muhammad Salīm al-‘Awwā, who proposed key features for mutual
respect between Muslims and
Christians, including the notion that a man’s religious beliefs should not be
reflected in his ways of
communicating with partners in society and the need to avoid denying public positions on
the basis of
religion.
Al-‘Awwā said that a man’s efficiency should strictly be the
general
criterion for appointment, urging clerics to stop polemicizing others’ religious beliefs as this
encourages
the general public to get involved ignorantly in criticizing the faith of their partners in the society,
which in turn could lead to the emergence of fanaticism and indiscriminate anger.