The
author says that
although Metropolitan Bīshouy’s book was small, it contains a lot of misunderstandings
and generalizations
that clash with the simplest rules of scientific way of thinking.
He says that
the archbishop has
erroneously condensed the reformist movement, in the person of Martin Luther, while the
facts of history affirm
that there were many factors behind the emergence of the Reformation, like the
medieval papacy with its absolute
powers and the church leaders’ excessive wealth and immoral
practices.
The author states that the
reformation movement was much deeper than one person, adding
that perhaps Metropolitan Bīshouy agrees with
him that the Arab and Eastern world needs religious reform
in order to catch up with the 21st
century.
The author criticizes Metropolitan
Bīshouy’s selectivity when speaking about Protestant
churches in the West that allow homosexuality and
same-sex marriage while there are other Protestant churches in
the West that are conservative and even
stricter than some churches in the East.
He denies Metropolitan
Bīshouy’s allegations that the
Protestant church is trying to "invade" Kafr al-Shaykh and get Orthodox
Christians to embrace Protestant
beliefs, noting that it is high time that people’s minds should be set free
to let the people choose their
beliefs by themselves.