43. Muslim thinkers’ religious opinions on insults against the companions and household of the Prophet Muhammad

Publishers

Year: 
2006
Week: 
47
Article number: 
43
Article pages: 
pp. 1, 6
Date of source: 
20-11-2006
Author: 
Not mentioned
Reviewer: 
Shayma’ al-Shami
Article summary: 

In the light of al-Ghad’s

publication of the

"offensive" supplement which attacked the Prophet Muhammad’s companions and wife, the author of

the

article stresses the need for a consistent application of the law which criminalizes insulting religions.

Article full text: 

The

article

discusses the application of the Egyptian law which criminalizes insulting religions. According to

the author of the article

[Reviewer: No name mentioned], the adoption of legislations to protect the

sanctity of religions, while allowing a

responsible freedom of expression, is absolutely crucial at this

moment in time.

Commenting on the controversial

supplement attacking the Prophet’s companions

and wife, ‘Ā’ishah, published by al-Ghad

newspaper a few weeks ago, the

author says that under article 98 of the penal code, the "contempt for religion" charge is

punishable with

imprisonment anywhere from six months to five years.

The author says that for the past few years the

law has only been applied in a few cases. The article cites the ruling against ‘Abd al-

Sabūr al-

Kāshif, an employee at an institute affiliated with the Azhar, who was

sentenced to one year in prison, as a

case in point. In February 2002, an engineer, Sharīf

Farahāt, received the severest punishment on charges of

distorting a number of

Qur’ānic verses and violating public morals. Farahāt was one of 52 men

arrested

on suspicion that they had consentingly engaged in homosexual behavior.

When asked for his opinion on the

issue, the former Egyptian Muftī¸ Shaykh Nasr Farīd Wāsil, said that

insulting the

prophet’s companions offends public morality, adding that defending religious symbols is

fard ‘Ayn,

and not "fard kifāyah" [Reviewer: The word kifāyah

literary means ’collective.’ It is a duty

which is imposed on the whole community of believers.

The classic example of Farḍ kifāyah is the jihād:

the individual is not required to

perform it as long as a sufficient number of community members fulfill it].

Speaking

of his friends,

the Prophet Muhammad said, "Do not curse my Companions! Do not curse my Companions! I swear by Him in Whose

Hand my life is, that even if one among you had as much gold as Mount Uhud and spent it in the way of

Allāh,

this would not be equal in reward to a handful spent by them or even to its half." In

another hadīth, the

prophet said, "No one loves them [Reviewer: his companions] except a

Muslim, and no one hates them except a hypocrite, and

whoever loves them, Allāh loves them,

and whoever hates them, Allāh hates

them."

Shaykh Jamāl Qutb, the former

head of the Azhar’s Fatwá Committee, indicates that

it is religiously unacceptable for

Muslims to curse time and non-human beings, including plants and animals. The prophet

said, "Do not curse

time, for verily, time is Allāh." Therefore, Muslims should observe the standards of

decency

and practice good manners and polite behavior toward all people.

"…and speak kindly to mankind." [Chapter of

‘al-Baqarah’ (the Cow) 2: 83, ‘The Meaning of the Glorious Qur’ān,’ by Muhammad

Marmaduke Pickthall].

"Call unto the way of thy Lord with wisdom and fair exhortation, and reason with them

in the better way." [Chapter of ‘al-

Nahl’ (the Bees) 16: 125]. Shaykh Qutb says that, as explained

in the above-mentioned verses, Muslims are ordered by

God to behave well towards humans, animals, plants

and inanimate objects.

Dr. Muhammad Ra’fat

‘Uthmān, a professor of Fiqh

and Sharī‘ah at the Azhar University, says

that insulting the prophet’s

companions without exception is an act of Kufr, [Reviewer: apostasy] because God paid

tribute to them in

the Qur’ānic verse, "Allāh taking pleasure in them and they in Him."

[Chapter of ‘al-Mā’idah’ (the Table) 5: 119]

Fulltext type: 
Summary
Quality: 
The article contains no obvious errors...
Classification: 
Opinion
Share this