Displaying 31 - 40 of 104.
The Cairo State Security Prosecution ordered the imprisonment of 11 Muslim Brotherhood leaders who were seized while having a meeting in the house of one of them. According to a report submitted by the State Security Investigation Department to the Prosecution, the Brotherhood exploits the...
The Shura Council has agreed upon establishing a national council for human rights. The author interviewed many human rights activists to give their comments on the advantages and disadvantages of establishing such a council.
Supreme State Security Court endorsed a sentence issued against fundamentalist Ahmed Abdel Hafez, member of the Jihad group, in absentia in 1992. He fled for more than 15 years and was later extradited to Egypt by Bosnia.
The article is a defense of fundamentalist Usama Roshdy against a campaign in The Netherlands aiming to deport him to Egypt with the help of the Egyptian authorities.
Muslim Brotherhood chief Muhammad Mahdī ‘Ākif said Rice’s statements dismissing contacts or relations between Washington and the group assert the fact that they have never had ties with the US as propagated by the Egyptian government.
The New York Times has published an article in defense of Saad Eddin Ibrahim. It attacks the Egyptian justice, saying that if the court that ordered a retrial for Ibrahim has even modicum of integrity, it will find him innocent of all charges.
The Court of Cassation will hear a retrial of Saad Eddin Ibrahim on February 4 after it overturned the seven-year imprisonment sentence issued against him by the State Security Court twice.
The case of Saad Eddin Ibrahim is a criminal one and is not politically motivated. He is being tried by law and nothing else. When the Court of Cassation overturned the verdict of the Supreme State Security Court, Ibrahim got his legal right to a retrial.
The Court of Cassation will release its final decision concerning Saad Eddin Ibrahim on January 7. It nullified a seven-year sentence issued twice by the Supreme State Security Court. It will hear a new trial by itself according to law.
The fourth annual report on religious freedom, issued by the US State Department, raised many questions concerning the methods and objectives of its preparation. This report lost much of its credibility when it was found to contain false information which the US State Department gained from anti-...

Pages

Subscribe to